Gallagher | Minneapolis Criminal Lawyer · 612-333-1500

 

Home

Witness and Pre-Charge

Homicide

Criminal Vehicular MN

Sex Crime Charges

Sex Statutes (MN)

Prostitution in Minnesota

Indecent Conduct (MN)

Drug Crime Charges

Drug Statutes (MN)

Possession (Drugs)

Marijuana Laws Minnesota

Marijuana Grow Minnesota

Medical Marijuana MN

Forfeiture Law Minnesota

Federal Court

Domestic Crime Charges

Domestic Statutes MN

Theft and Property Crimes

Guns and Firearms

Possession (Guns)

Restoration Civil Rights

Carry Permit MN

DWI - DUI Driving-Related

Felony DWI Minnesota

Breath-Alcohol Machine MN

Urine Testing MN

FAQ (DWI)

Detox Release

Juvenile Delinquency

Juv Court Records

Expungement

Minnesota Constitution

FAQ

Do I Need Defense Lawyer

Steps in the Process

Immigration Consequences

Criminal Defenses

Self-Defense in Minnesota

Disorderly-Conduct

Speeding Laws in MN

Resources

Lawyers - Other States

California

Colorado

Florida

Michigan

Attorney Profile

Minneapolis Criminal Law

Contact Information

Urine Testing in Minnesota DWI Cases is Scientifically Invalid
Urine Testing is unreliable, banned in most states
Collecting a targeted driver's urine for use as evidence in a DWI prosecution is banned in most states
in the United States - and for good reason.  Minnesota is still in the dark ages of using urine sampling for alcohol-related driving cases.

Not only that, Minnesota has its law enforcement officers ("LEOs") collect samples in a scientifically invalid way.  Most states that still use urine evidence, despite its serious flaws, at least require the sample to be a "second void" in order to avoid the huge problem of "urine pooling."

What is the urine "pooling" problem?  No, it's not a reference to kids and swimming pools.  An illustration will help explain.  Imagine a person drinks five alcohol beverages over a several hours, then stops consuming alcohol for a few hours before driving.  That's what we want people to do, right?  Well, imagine he is stopped for expired tabs by a police officer, who then smells the odor of an alcoholic beverage.  A urine sample is obtained, a "first void."  Even though the person would by then get a blood test result of below 0.04 BAC, the urine test shows 0.08.  How could it be?  The answer is that if the person did not urinate during this entire period, most of the alcohol she consumed would still be in her urine.  

Yet the way the laws in Minnesota are written, it may be irrelevant that her blood alcohol level was 0.04, if her urine alcohol level was 0.08, just as it is legally irrelevant that her driving ability was not impaired.  Welcome to DWI enforcement and prosecution in Minnesota.

Have Truth, Liberty and Justice been sacrificed upon the altar of law-enforcement expediency?

A targeted person needs serious legal expertise, like that of DWI Defense Attorney Thomas Gallagher, on his or her side to fight back against this unfair, unjust web of laws and scientifically flawed evidence.

That was then. This is now. Urine tests in Minnesota are flawed.

© 2012 Thomas C Gallagher, Attorney, 310 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 8000, Minneapolis Minnesota 55415



Nothing on this website is legal advice. Only a lawyer fully informed about the facts of your potential case, after research of relevant law, can be in a position to give legal advice. Information here is for general information.

Serving The People of the local Mpls - St Paul Twin Cities metropolitan area in Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Anoka, Wright, Carver, Scott, Dakota, and Washington Counties (greater Minnesota only upon special consideration).

  Websites:
Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney | Minnesota Defense Attorney | Minneapolis Criminal Lawyer 
  Our Blog: 
Minneapolis Criminal Law News 
                                                                                          xml sitemap

Defending your Liberty in Minnesota State and Federal Court since 1988